Studies
Partners/ Authors | M Vitacca, L Bianchi, A Guerra, C Fracchia, A Spanevello, B Balbi, S Scalvini |
Start & end date | 2008 |
Focus | The aim of the present study was to primarily evaluate reduction in hospitalisations and, secondly, exacerbations, general practitioner (GP) calls and related costeffectiveness of teleassistance (TA) for these patients. |
Outcome | No anthropometric and clinical differences were found between groups both in baseline and in mortality (18% for TA, 23% for controls). Compared with controls, the TA group experienced significantly fewer hospitalisations (-36%), urgent GP calls (-65%) and acute exacerbations (-71%). After deduction of TA costs, the average overall cost for each patient was 33% less than that for usual care. In chronic respiratory failure patients on oxygen or home mechanical ventilation, a nurse-centred tele-assistance prevents hospitalisations while it is cost-effective. The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease group seems to have a greater advantage from tele-assistance. |
Website | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18799512/ |
Our solution is designed to help clinics easily implement Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) and Chronic Care Management (CCM) services. It can be smoothly integrated into your current workflow to improve clinical outcomes and optimize profits.