Studies
Partners/ Authors | Catherine Klersy, Annalisa De Silvestri, Gabriella Gabutti, Arturo Raisaro, Moreno Curti, François Regoli, Angelo Auricchio |
Start & end date | 2011 |
Focus | To assess the cost-effectiveness and the cost utility of remote patient monitoring (RPM) when compared with the usual care approach based upon differences in the number of hospitalizations, estimated from a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). |
Outcome | The difference in costs between RPM and usual care ranged from €300 to €1000, favouring RPM. These cost savings combined with a quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gain of 0.06 suggest that RPM is a 'dominant' technology over existing standard care. |
Website | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21193439/ |
Our solution is designed to help clinics easily implement Remote Patient Monitoring (RPM) and Chronic Care Management (CCM) services. It can be smoothly integrated into your current workflow to improve clinical outcomes and optimize profits.